Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

That language is from her saying he forced a tongue kiss on her in rehearsal. And again, his finger tips are plainly touching. Obvious. Is it not groping because it's just his fingers?

Yet they're using this prominently in a way that suggests something far worse. If his fingertips' shadows (the ones not parallel to light/lens line) were considerably smaller, yes. They're only about half as small, which suggests less than half the distance but not touching.

Far worse than him forcibly tongue-kissing her? What do you think is being suggested that's worse than that?

If you don't see it, you're happier not knowing.

I just wanted you to say it. It's reported accurately. It's not sensationalized to want to wash the taste of an unwanted tongue out of your own mouth.

I hope you'll look back at the first sentence later, once your passion for the subject has faded.

I'm only passionate about facts. Fact: He groped her, because fingertips count. Fact: She claimed he forced his tongue into her mouth during a kiss rehearsal that he was incredibly persistent about. These are the facts. Your bias is showing.

I'm not defending someone I perceive as a personal acquaintance who I know well enough to attest that they wouldn't lie. If there's corroboration Franken touched her against her will, hang him by the balls. Until then, I think not even talking to the photog is weird.