1) You can be in favor of the second amendment and still despise the NRA. 2) The percentage of people who want to violate the constitution is inconsequential. Which is the point of the Bill of Rights. 3) If we could ban things due to "style", first to go: Joe's glasses.https://twitter.com/joenbc/status/930845633535234055 …
-
Right and that was the point I was getting at just didn’t know how to articulate it. Most wouldn’t. But a “yes” should require just a chat with a mental health professional to attest to their mental capacity.
Only a yes to a violent mental illness, not to OCD or ADHD or something. That's nuts.
-
-
Listen, we agree, which is beneficial. We’re hashing out semantics here. But how do you define violent mental illness? I think the biggest problem is how little we understand mental illness. Is OCD inherently violent? No. Can it be? Yes
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.