So Republicans are planning to explode the deficit in order to cut taxes on the wealthy. Nobody should be surprised -- but many are, Why? 1/
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @paulkrugman
Paul Krugman, economist, thinks economies are static. Wealth creation is spurred by investments and savings. Not by govt's wasteful spending
39 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 16 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @WillRicci @paulkrugman
Wealth creation is spurred by both. And if we "make the pie bigger" but all of the pie growth goes to 1% of the people, what's the point?
5 odpowiedzi 22 podane dalej 266 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @paulkrugman
Wealth creation is not spurred by government spending. The money must be taken from elsewhere. Wealth creation in the economy.
41 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @WillRicci @paulkrugman
That's simply not true. When properly managed, every dollar of tax money put into an economy results in anywhere from $1.50-2.50 in growth.
7 odpowiedzi 23 podane dalej 201 polubionych -
Look at it like this, Will: Imagine a person who takes home $10 million in a year, after taxes. Milk still costs $5. Gas is still $3/gal. 1/
6 odpowiedzi 24 podane dalej 105 polubionych -
So they end up putting 90% of that money in savings. They sock it away. That removes that money from circulation in the economy. 2/
10 odpowiedzi 13 podanych dalej 125 polubionych -
Economies only work if money is *moving*. You can have the most money of any country in the world, but if it's not moving, economy dies. 3/
4 odpowiedzi 22 podane dalej 157 polubionych -
And rich people/corporations don't hire people just because they have money. Jobs aren't charity. They hire people only if there's need. 4/
5 odpowiedzi 26 podanych dalej 183 polubione -
Tell that to Buffett, Gates, Bezos mist of tgeir wealth is in ownership of stocks & their companies have 100k emoloyees creating jobs
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
I don't think you grasped the concept.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.