So Republicans are planning to explode the deficit in order to cut taxes on the wealthy. Nobody should be surprised -- but many are, Why? 1/
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @paulkrugman
Paul Krugman, economist, thinks economies are static. Wealth creation is spurred by investments and savings. Not by govt's wasteful spending
39 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 16 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @WillRicci @paulkrugman
Wealth creation is spurred by both. And if we "make the pie bigger" but all of the pie growth goes to 1% of the people, what's the point?
5 odpowiedzi 22 podane dalej 266 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @paulkrugman
Wealth creation is not spurred by government spending. The money must be taken from elsewhere. Wealth creation in the economy.
41 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @WillRicci @paulkrugman
That's simply not true. When properly managed, every dollar of tax money put into an economy results in anywhere from $1.50-2.50 in growth.
7 odpowiedzi 23 podane dalej 201 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @RealSteveCox @paulkrugman
The transfer of wealth is decidedly not wealth creation. Not even close. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/228760/job-creation-snow-job-thomas-sowell …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
We have history to look at now. Can you please show us one time when taxes were lowered on the wealthy and it spurred more good jobs?
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.