Economies only work if money is *moving*. You can have the most money of any country in the world, but if it's not moving, economy dies. 3/
-
-
And rich people/corporations don't hire people just because they have money. Jobs aren't charity. They hire people only if there's need. 4/
5 odpowiedzi 26 podanych dalej 183 polubione -
If they don't NEED to hire someone, they don't hire anyone, regardless of their tax rate. Hiring is based on need. Need comes from sales. 5/
2 odpowiedzi 12 podanych dalej 101 polubionych -
So, if you want to create jobs, you need to make sure as much money as possible continues to circulate in the economy. 6/
2 odpowiedzi 10 podanych dalej 101 polubionych -
To do that, you have to make sure you tax the very wealthy enough to make sure enough of that money returns to the economy. 7/
3 odpowiedzi 9 podanych dalej 93 polubione -
That way, those taxes can be used to employ school teachers, police officers, road workers, and even (dreaded) bureaucrats to some degree 8/
3 odpowiedzi 8 podanych dalej 93 polubione -
And by employing those people at good, but modest, wages, that money stays in the economy, which spurs corporate sales, and leads to jobs 9/
2 odpowiedzi 8 podanych dalej 89 polubionych -
That's how you create jobs. That's how it has always worked. And that's how you fix our economy. And it's completely logical. 10/10
#fin16 odpowiedzi 13 podanych dalej 160 polubionych -
Question. Wouldn't money really move if lower income folks got a better tax break? Extra$ would allow them to eat out sometimes. /1
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @RobAnybody2@RealSteveCox i jeszcze
They could afford to buy paper towels, new furniture, electronics etc. Return $ back into the economy. Does that make sense? /X
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.