So they end up putting 90% of that money in savings. They sock it away. That removes that money from circulation in the economy. 2/
-
-
Economies only work if money is *moving*. You can have the most money of any country in the world, but if it's not moving, economy dies. 3/
4 odpowiedzi 22 podane dalej 157 polubionych -
And rich people/corporations don't hire people just because they have money. Jobs aren't charity. They hire people only if there's need. 4/
5 odpowiedzi 26 podanych dalej 183 polubione -
If they don't NEED to hire someone, they don't hire anyone, regardless of their tax rate. Hiring is based on need. Need comes from sales. 5/
2 odpowiedzi 12 podanych dalej 101 polubionych -
So, if you want to create jobs, you need to make sure as much money as possible continues to circulate in the economy. 6/
2 odpowiedzi 10 podanych dalej 101 polubionych -
To do that, you have to make sure you tax the very wealthy enough to make sure enough of that money returns to the economy. 7/
3 odpowiedzi 9 podanych dalej 93 polubione -
That way, those taxes can be used to employ school teachers, police officers, road workers, and even (dreaded) bureaucrats to some degree 8/
3 odpowiedzi 8 podanych dalej 93 polubione -
And by employing those people at good, but modest, wages, that money stays in the economy, which spurs corporate sales, and leads to jobs 9/
2 odpowiedzi 8 podanych dalej 89 polubionych -
That's how you create jobs. That's how it has always worked. And that's how you fix our economy. And it's completely logical. 10/10
#fin16 odpowiedzi 13 podanych dalej 160 polubionych -
Question. Wouldn't money really move if lower income folks got a better tax break? Extra$ would allow them to eat out sometimes. /1
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
Yes. Assuming they have enough to cover their bills.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.