So Republicans are planning to explode the deficit in order to cut taxes on the wealthy. Nobody should be surprised -- but many are, Why? 1/
-
-
Look at it like this, Will: Imagine a person who takes home $10 million in a year, after taxes. Milk still costs $5. Gas is still $3/gal. 1/
-
So they end up putting 90% of that money in savings. They sock it away. That removes that money from circulation in the economy. 2/
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
After socking it away then scream about inheritance tax. So heirs that didn't earn it don't have to pay a gift tax. Greed one of the 7
-
Interestingly, many of the Founders of this country wanted to ban inheritance altogether. They saw it as an "artificial aristocracy."
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
The transfer of wealth is decidedly not wealth creation. Not even close. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/228760/job-creation-snow-job-thomas-sowell …
-
We have history to look at now. Can you please show us one time when taxes were lowered on the wealthy and it spurred more good jobs?
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
This is a good explanation here. But like Paul said, there are zero serious honest republicans so it wasn’t worth explaining it to Will.
-
I'm only aware of like 3 honest Democrats... Jimmy Carter, Tulsi Gabbard, and... Nevermind. 2. I know of 2.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Or if invested into Early Childhood Education, a ROI of as much as $8-12, per the Mpls Fed a bit over a decade ago
:https://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/fedgazette/early-childhood-development-economic-development-with-a-high-public-return …Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.