Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

Ahhh yes Wikileaks, the site that is spoon fed "evidence" from from Russia. I'm sure their conclusions aren't biased.

They didn't get anything from Russia. At all. And that actually has been proven.

[citation needed]

The problem is hacks like you who can't admit to a factor that doesn't fit your narrative. You act like you're different, but you're not.

We need an INFORMED electorate, not an electorate clinging to one set of talking points over another. Stop muddying the waters you hack.

1/3 Here's a U.K. Ambassador stating he directly received the DNC/Podesta leaks from an insider for Wikileaks: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/amp/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html …

Assange has repeatedly stated they were leaks, not hacks. The FBI never checked the server. The company that did... https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/23/cybersecurity-firm-that-attributed-dnc-hacks-to-russia-may-have-fabricated-russia-hacking-in-ukraine/ …

And metadata shows the leaks were downloaded too fast to have been downloaded overseas. USB speed. https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/ …