It's always a retraction of a point that bolsters the Trump/Russia narrative. That should be alarming. Examples here https://theintercept.com/2017/09/28/yet-another-major-russia-story-falls-apart-is-skepticism-permissible-yet/ …
-
Comey also said that firing him wouldn't make any investigations to away, here:pic.twitter.com/QVFYP8e9xj
And a former U.K. ambassador directly stated that he received the DNC & Podesta leaks directly from an insider, then gave them to Wikileaks
-
-
Here's that story. And Assange has said from the start that it was a leak, not a hack. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/amp/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html …
-
Which means even if Russia did hack the server (which we can't know, as our Intel hasn't even looked at it), they didn't leak it.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.