Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

How can it be HRC and not Trump, who wouldnt criticize Putin if he dropped a nuke on Guam? I'm open to new info, feel free to cite something

This will take a few posts. Please be patient. This came out 2 1/2 years ago: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html …

This came out a week ago: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration?amp …

And just yesterday, the informant from the story above got clearance to testify to congress: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/357230-fbi-informant-in-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery-cleared-to-testify-before?amp …

Not surprisingly, none of this has gotten much attention from CNN, NBC, etc, all of which are "all-in" on the fake Trump/Russia narrative.

Then, two days ago, this comes out (it was actually first reported in October of 2016 by another source): https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html …

And in a world where retractions *used* to be rare, with mainstream press, they've all printed dozens now. Always from the exact same angle: