We have enough gullible, proudly uneducated morons that believe everything from Fox, etc... to sway any vote and think Stump doesn’t lie.
-
Then, two days ago, this comes out (it was actually first reported in October of 2016 by another source): https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html …
The recent book (written by a former Politico reporter & a former part of DWS's PAC) "Shattered", about the failed Clinton Campaign, said:pic.twitter.com/Qfg8Ssvkg5
-
-
And in a world where retractions *used* to be rare, with mainstream press, they've all printed dozens now. Always from the exact same angle:
-
It's always a retraction of a point that bolsters the Trump/Russia narrative. That should be alarming. Examples here https://theintercept.com/2017/09/28/yet-another-major-russia-story-falls-apart-is-skepticism-permissible-yet/ …
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.