Yeah, the U.S. intelligence community begs to differ. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/the-intelligence-community-report-on-russian-activities-in-the-2016-election/2153/ …
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @TheFakeJBlowers @Sethrogen
That's the same Intel community who lied about WMDs, the Gulf of Tonkin, etc, right?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
There isn't evidence for it. Wikileaks showed that "Russia" was a planned narrative way before she lost. So did the book, "Shattered".
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Ahhh yes Wikileaks, the site that is spoon fed "evidence" from from Russia. I'm sure their conclusions aren't biased.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
They didn't get anything from Russia. At all. And that actually has been proven.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Yeah, hi once again a claim of yours has easily been disproven with a quick Google search https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/10/13/politics/russia-us-election/index.html …
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @TheFakeJBlowers@RealSteveCox i jeszcze
Believe what you'd like man, but you haven't provided a shred of evidence to prove a single claim.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
I'll take the time, just for you, to prove everything I've said. All I ask are specific questions from you. Tell me what you want proven.
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
...Election. But you'd only be fooling yourself. I'm sure if you had definitive proof you'd not be peddling your propaganda on Twitter...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Read my replies to your last tweet. I can prove anything I say. It's not easy on Twitter, but I'll do it. Just give me stories/questions.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.