Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

For the purpose of militia. At that time weapons were kept locked away in arsenals and access was a huge problem. 2a solved that issue.

Sorry, that's incorrect. The states believed allowing the federal government to run the militias was dangerous, 1/3

so they wanted "the people" to be able to be armed in potential defense from the federal militia. That was the push for the #2A. 2/3

It is an acknowledgment of the necessity of militia followed by a guarantee of the rights of the people. That's the 2nd amendment. 3/3

It’s a shield for gun lobbyist to hide behind. Follow the money.

I'm getting no money from the gun lobby. Can you explain my position if it's about money?

If it’s not that I have no idea. If you can’t admit we need reform I’m out. Like for good.

We need reform. It's not any of the reforms we've seen from anybody on the anti-gun side, though. Zero mass shootings would've been 1/2