I went to a meeting of a "progressive group" last week. It's a misnomer. They're a Democrat group. I figured out how to tell beforehand: 1/?
Pokaż ten wątek
If the group formed after Nov '16, it's a Democrat group. You should've seen the look some gave me when I said I'm a proud non-Democrat. 2/?
-
-
One lady almost reflexively asked me if I was going to endorse the Democrat vs Ed Royce after I lose the primary. I smiled. 3/
Pokaż ten wątek -
I'm not planning on losing, and if I do, I'm not endorsing anybody who doesn't meet a high percentage of the ideals I believe in. 4/
Pokaż ten wątek -
These people are lost. They think a Democrat can defeat a Republican incumbent in a gerrymandered Republican district. 5/
Pokaż ten wątek -
The state went for Hillary last year by about 30 points, and Royce still beat the Democrat in District 39 by 14 points. 6/
Pokaż ten wątek -
An independent has a shot. Democrats don't. But watch the Dems pour money into Dem candidates. Either I'll beat them, or Royce will. 7/
Pokaż ten wątek -
This is a time when people are going to have to decide if they want to keep pushing the same, stale, dogmatic agendas, to the same ends. 8/
Pokaż ten wątek -
Or actually back authentic candidates based on principals and ideals that they want to make happen for our country. 9/
Pokaż ten wątek -
"Independent" isn't just a lack of party affiliation. It's a way of thinking. And it's what we need in DC.
#ThePartiesAreTheProblem 10/10Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.