That's the wrong question, bud. Here's the right one: Who benefits from the people fighting amongst each other?
-
-
Your "who benefits frm" = my
#WhoProfits =#CuiBono Same Q in each case Look at ACTIONS (or conspicuous LACK of ACTIONS) and ask again.1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Not the same question. Yours presumes there are "sides". There aren't.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
There are sides IRL These Corp Fascist
#Shitweasels https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig … Vs. Citizens & Constitution MSM intentionally =D"vs"R 2 distract1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 0 polubionych -
The sides are "establishment" and "the rest of us." That's it. These rallies do not address these sides whatsoever.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
Dude! That's EXACTLY the point of my
#Charlottesville article I cited earlier Try reading it.1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Why would I read your article when you're in here pushing a partisan narrative?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
What, exactly, is "partisan" about saying both Partys are feeding at the same hog troughs? I'm Progressive not D or R
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Are you trying to convince me (now) that pointing out the NG's role, or lack of role, wasn't meant to take a side btween Antifa & Nazis?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
Read the article You're just being intentionally obtuse now Let me know when u start thinking critically again. I'm out.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
^ Self-promotion thinly disguised as discussion.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.