New Real Peer Review

@RealPeerReview

New , with blackjack and intelligent, evidence-respecting academic peers. Complaints should be filed with Machine Priestess (use fax)

Online, reading your abstract
Joined June 2016

Tweets

You blocked @RealPeerReview

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @RealPeerReview

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Jul 31

    Our group's main admin has changed handle due to issues unrelated to Real Peer Review. No need to be alarmed.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Oct 11
    Undo
  3. Oct 10

    Are you going to blame this one on quantum physics too?

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Oct 10
    Undo
  5. Oct 8

    When anti-video game researchers sell their science at the expense of truth

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Oct 8

    We wonder if this classic text is also a part of an even more subtle, even more deeply undercover academic hoax. A Deep if you will

    Undo
  7. Oct 7
    Undo
  8. Oct 7

    The insights provided by this paper...

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Oct 7

    There's apparently no need to hide the activism these days.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Oct 7

    A recent contribution to the same journal that published the dog park hoax paper. This is apparently a bad thing.

    Undo
  11. Oct 6

    "In turning attention to this understudied and overdetermining space — the black anus — “Black Anality” considers the racial meanings produced in pornographic texts that insistently return to the black female anus as a critical site of pleasure, peril, and curiosity."

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Oct 6

    "Using Racial and Class Differences in Infant Mortality to Teach about White Privilege: A Cooperative Group Activity"

    Undo
  13. Oct 6

    I wonder if people from "dox OKULTRA" groups will now start subscribing to paid anti-plagiarism services and submitting the Mein Kampf paper to try and find what service one of my (t)employers uses

    Undo
  14. Oct 4

    Dr. Strickland on why she's not a full professor: "...I never filled out the paperwork. It's all on me. I think people are thinking it's because I'm a woman, I'm being held back. I'm just a lazy person. I do what I want to do and that wasn't worth doing."

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Oct 4
    Replying to and

    A shame these alternate ways of knowing don't enable reviewers in a distinctly nonminor women's studies journal to "know" when they get a literal Mein Kampf snowclone as submission

    This Tweet is unavailable.
    Undo
  16. Oct 4

    Really makes you think 🤔

    Undo
  17. Oct 4

    The irony of autoethnography defenders criticizing the "grievance studies" hoax on methodological grounds.

    Undo
  18. Oct 4

    But "scary/sexy screen peexils / VHS scan lines WILL NOT cause increase in rape, murder, arson and other baditude" makes for a bad grant application....

    Undo
  19. Oct 4

    After even more Black Feminism(s) were added, the paper was accepted, with Managing Editor even claiming to be "pleased" by this turn of events. THE END (OR IS IT?)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Oct 4

    Reviewer 3 also seems to believe that dog rape is a whiteness issue, takes issue with the paper being too much like a "science paper", and wants even more Black Feminism(s). We do, however, agree with R3 that Harlan Weaver is indeed very relevant to the issue of dog rape culture

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Oct 4

    Reviewer 3 seems to raise important points regarding absence of due process in dog rape accusations

    Show this thread
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·