U r essentialy sayin the same. Reason why those acounts got blockd n why his video demonetizd r nt comparabl. Former deservd it, latter didn
The Constitution disagrees with you. Sedition and fake news are free speech. Unless of course, if you are a BJP supporter who supports all the changes made to article 19 by Nehru post 1950, just because they don't want to be offended. You either have free speech or you don't.
-
-
What you are saying is inconsistent with itself. U're saying Nehru changed article 19 n then congress lived with it 4 so long, but still only BJP supporters can think the change was right. And this is when BJP is the prime peddler of fake news today. Doesn't add up!
-
No, your statements are the ones which don't add up. Here are the facts: Artcle 19 was amended UNCONSTITUTIONALLY (just like 377 was unconstitutional, being a law doesn't make it morally right) And a private corporation like Youtube has every right to defund a video. Good day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Further, if article 19 was changd, its new form is the constitution now. This is aside from the fact that whether sedition/fake news are free speech has nothing to do with whether I support BJP or you support Congress or any other political party.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.