@RavensSalaryCap Is this an effort on McClain's part to ensure he doesn't get cut (failed physical)?
-
-
-
Most likely, yes. RT
@johnbkistler:@RavensSalaryCap Is this an effort on McClain's part to ensure he doesn't get cut (failed physical)? -
@RavensSalaryCap@johnbkistler Its essentially what they would have had to pay him in injury benefits (1.55 mil over 2) if he never plays -
@Jason_OTC@johnbkistler True, but Injury Protection Benefit does yet count against Cap, does it? They obviously wanted to keep him around -
@RavensSalaryCap@johnbkistler Right. I think most teams would prefer to hold out hope someone plays. Plus it looks bad to release -
No doubt
@Jason_OTC@johnbkistler Right. I think most teams would prefer to hold out hope someone plays. Plus it looks bad to release - 1 more reply
-
-
-
@RavensSalaryCap so instead of 4$ mil it's up to 5.5$ mil? Ok -
Yes, the Ravens are now $5,529,459 under the Cap. MT
@LaLaLaLaToya so instead of 4$ mil it's up to 5.5$ mil? -
@RavensSalaryCap@LaLaLaLaToya so this pay cut should cover the 2 additional players when the cap goes to 53 players. -
@AVP1983@RavensSalaryCap Oz did a great job! Retooled the D, great acquisitions, didnt mortgage the future to do it
-
-
@RavensSalaryCap why did he take a 50% pay cut? Was he in danger of being released? -
@RavensSalaryCap Why not just cut him and save 3 million?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.