1. You're assuming that 1a. We aren't eliminating people with those views with the vetting proses 1b. That we are letting in enough people with those views to cause cultural problems.https://twitter.com/TheFrogNation/status/937901620020494336 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @RationalDis
How are we going to vet cultural views? "Do you believe in Islam? Do you believe in stoning women" idk how we catch those people unless they tell us. Most radicals aren't criminals or terrorists
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheFrogNation @RationalDis
It literally is a slippery slope issue. The more immigrants that come in, the more they vote for easier immigration. The example of how this can be bad is europe
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheFrogNation
Do you even know how through our vetting proses is? Maybe you shouldn't voice an opinion on this stuff if you don't know how the current system works. One of the most through systems on the planet.pic.twitter.com/3g60tfCnPx
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis
In many countries background checks aren't easy because of poorly kept records (some of those countries are in the ban). And ideological tests aren't easy which is why I'm saying getting cultural views is hard to do.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheFrogNation
No one is saying that it's easy to do & the time it takes is directly proportional to how long it takes to do a thorough background check. If this really was a problem & we were letting in dangerous radical people then why are Muslims stoning ppl across the country?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis
It's not a problem right now in America given we have almost 0% of Muslims (who have killed more people in America than whites through terrorism)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheFrogNation @RationalDis
The issue is I don't want it to become a problem. Most immigrants vote democrats and democrats usually want laxer laws on immigration and so more come in to vote for pro immigration candidates and so on
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheFrogNation
See, the issue here is that Republicans became more Nationalistic. Go back to the 1980s & Republicans were actually reasonable. Why do you think the Republican autopsy found that they needed to reach out to minorities? Maybe reform YOUR group. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsmgPp_nlok …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis
Because of Reagan and amnesty, California is permanently blue while previously they were a purple state
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, fuck man. I guess are should just cut ourselves off & have our population & economy stagnate. Anything to keep them Dems from winning, right?
-
-
Replying to @RationalDis
Well we could have a temporary stop on immigration and limit immigration to prevent population decline
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.