I mean, literally ONLY thing I can think why you did this was maybe meeting Page 3 girls, but surely your marriage stronger than that?
-
-
Replying to @ImJonIveArrived @Sargon_of_Akkad
Because otherwise I'm stumped man. You act all offended and say you'd never take money from S*n, doesn't change terrible journalism ethos.
2 replies 0 retweets 35 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Sargon_of_Akkad
One single thing? That's all I need?
@Hbomberguy disagrees with you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc24YtUslCU …6 replies 4 retweets 88 likes -
Blatantly misrepresenting rape studies to claim problem non-existent certainly seems to me the very definition of "unethical journalism"
6 replies 2 retweets 115 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Sargon_of_Akkad @Hbomberguy
...That's it? A huge bunch of the comments call this guy on pedantics and sophistry, and the fact you blatantly don't read your sources.
5 replies 2 retweets 137 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Sargon_of_Akkad @Hbomberguy
Thunderf00t is a PhD and you're not. Curiously, this line of logic is not one you'd agree defeats you in your argument with him.
9 replies 6 retweets 211 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
What is this guy's PhD in exactly? Because if it isn't relevant to that field of study, it's an argument from athority fallacy.
-
-
Biology, which of course means that he's well-versed in social theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.