The 2 genders camp's arguments basically come down to "Well that sounds muddy & unclear" News flash: The world doesnt owe you simple answers
-
-
Replying to @RationalDis
XX and XY - clear as fucking day -biology doesn't give a shit about your virtue signaling.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @2AorGTFO
1. XX and XY have to do with sex, not gender. 2. Those aren't the only variations.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RationalDis
You demanded 'science' about your global warming hoax. Let's see your gender confusion science. I'll wait.pic.twitter.com/RGeKNzLGLO
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @2AorGTFO
1 There is empirical data for Climate Change, hard science Gender deals with psychology, soft science 2 Im still waiting on those citations
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RationalDis
I gave you hard science that shits on the marxist climatard narrative, why didn't you address it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @RationalDis
Rusty Shackleford Jr Retweeted Rusty Shackleford Jr
Greenland oxygen isotopes.https://twitter.com/2aorgtfo/status/862513514950217728 …
Rusty Shackleford Jr added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @2AorGTFO
That isn't a paper. It's an out of context graph. Give me the paper that it's from & then I'll address it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That only tells me when & where the data was collected. It doesn't provide the actual findings. Do you have a paper or not?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.