In this case you would just be doing it to be a shitlord, so no. If you were genuine then it's debatable. Not all Trans ppl have disphoria.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @federer231 @RationalDis and
Ryan brings up a legit point: if gender identity has no biological underpinnings, then does it convey anything about what the person is?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @federer231 and
Does identifying as male or female actually mean anything beyond expressing masculinity or femininity? If not, why's it need its own term?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @federer231 and
No I don't think that it does. Because people express themselves... & it's useful to have words that convey that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @federer231 and
Again, that's gender expression. Gender identity seems like it doesn't describe what anything IS. More acc term would be gender perception.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @RationalDis and
People are afraid to challenge an "identity," but they're much more ready to point out when a perception doesn't match physical reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @RationalDis and
That's one way in which these terms muddy the waters; makes it difficult to tell uncomfortable truthw.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @federer231 and
Okay here is what the APA says.pic.twitter.com/pMDFBw6Z5t
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @federer231 and
Like I said, that definition seems better suited to a term like "sexual perception."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That is the most semantic argument anyone has made in this thread...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.