And the idea of "a person's gender" makes no sense if gender is the standard expression spectrum itself, belonging to no individual.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @federer231 @RationalDis and
Yeah, "gender identity" makes sense only re: neurological defects, mental illness, or chromosome abnormalities. Otherwise, playing pretend.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @federer231 @RationalDis and
Their objective is to be able to define what sex they are without question. Everything else is in service to that, as inconsistent as it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @federer231 and
They first give "gender" a separate, fuzzy definition from sex, then conflate the two to diminish the latter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VideoVader @federer231 and
I'm just going to leave this here for you two. https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @federer231 and
Yes, we are familiar with those definitions. We dislike how they are misused to muddy "male/female" with "masculine/feminine."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Did you ever consider that the world, biology specifically, is more muddy than Column A or Column B?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 4 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.