The New York Times refuses to use the term 'female genital mutilation' & instead wants to call it 'genital cutting' What should we call it?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Janus6966 @datnofact
I have mixed feelings on that. I don't think we should say "Male general mutilation" because it is not as damaging. But it's still bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Removing ~10 square inches of blood-rich, nerve-dense flesh is ABSOLUTELY mutilation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But it isn't as bad in comparison when the current threshold is cutting off the most sensitive part of an organ & sewing another part shut.
9:09 PM - 27 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.