"0.017% risk is unacceptable! I want something that is better than 99.983% effective & we should ban everyone until we can get it!"https://twitter.com/ThreeGunsXd/status/855277721458327552 …
-
-
Replying to @RationalDis
Who was talking about banning everyone? We're talking about insuring 72 terrorists aren't in the country.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThreeGunsXd @RationalDis
You can pretend you're not shocked by how large that number is, but no one buys it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThreeGunsXd
You're talking about insuring 72 terrorist aren't in the country by banning 415,596 productive law abiding Americans.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis
They're not Americans. And we're talking about vetting out the 72. This IS NOT a ban.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThreeGunsXd
Sorry law abiding legal Permanent Residents, that's the numbers I used. Where did you cite that all 72 came here after 2011?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You can repeat yourself as much as you want to. My point still stands. The system works and a ban isn't needed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.