@kenanmalik The press is clearly marked at these events. You can't mix them up with randos. I'd say that I am maximally certain (1
-
-
-
that they were arrested despite the fact that they were documenting the riot. (2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Press Pass look it up Because being arrested & facing a 25K fine/10yr pris sentence on no good evidence isnt intimidating at all
-
They dont have to get it done be intimidated. Do you know how intimidation works? Threatening to break your legs is intimidation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no solid evidence against them and the press are clearly marked. It wasn't by accident. Intimidation is censorship.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No the evidence is that they were marked and identified themselves. Yet they were still arrested of no spacific evidence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They didn't have a good reason to arrest the press. What other reason is there? Oh yeah to intimate them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Intimidation is a form of censorship.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Them getting swept up is one thing. Them being detained and charged after they identified themselves on no evidence is another.pic.twitter.com/s3cM25Ob6l
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sorry youre right. Sounds like they had really good reasons to arrest them. Intimidation of the press is censorshippic.twitter.com/cDIApI657m
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.