Is letting 1,000 babies die by inaction socialism?
-
-
You act as if you’re still not killing 5,000 babies
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
No, I have to choose between strangling 5,000 babies or 6,000 babies with my bare hands I’m going to strangle 5,000 & spare 1,000 Trying to play word games so you feel righteous doesn’t change reality
4 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Congrats I’m glad you’re proud of killing 5,000 babies Kekpic.twitter.com/3eQClGWlnU
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Better than being proud of letting 6,000 be strangledpic.twitter.com/z7fmhwFGhc
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
-
“Less harm is good” is a 5head take nowadays
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
“I’m proud of killing 5,000 babies” is a 5 head take nowadays
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It’s the same thing dude You’re really channeling Tim Pool level arguments here. Should I use a movie analogy to help you understand?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think I get it, you just like framing the argument to make yourself sound better. But I am interested in the movie analogy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Bro, I answered your framing lol
-
-
Can I have the movie analogy?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.