"Rights" enforcement without a State would be utter chaos. Just look at how different local & state laws are from each other. "states rights" was literally an argument for people to impose racist policies without outside interference. This is why are have Federal laws.https://twitter.com/exiliaex/status/1241720820109623306 …
-
-
i agree! different states will disagree on whats a right. its separate from my point that states arent how rights are protected. states give the illusion of protection.
-
Oh god, is this a symantec difference? Sure individual people can "protect" their rights by themselves, but a State has more power to enforce rights over more people. Do you think those two things are exactly the same?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Omg please dude, read some anarchist theory on post state organization. We aren't calling for there to be no structure or something. Fuck. I hate arguing with people who refuse to consider anything outside their experience can exist.
-
Isn't that what Libertarians & Ancaps say too?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.