"Rights" enforcement without a State would be utter chaos. Just look at how different local & state laws are from each other. "states rights" was literally an argument for people to impose racist policies without outside interference. This is why are have Federal laws.https://twitter.com/exiliaex/status/1241720820109623306 …
-
-
My point is that when you leave groups to decide what "Rights" are you get wildly different decisions e.g. people in the south wanted segregation. If something is decided to be a right it has to be equally enforced everywhere. You can't do that without a State
-
i agree! different states will disagree on whats a right. its separate from my point that states arent how rights are protected. states give the illusion of protection.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.