You realize that YouTube doesn't own them a microphone or a platform, right? You literally just said that no one thinks that's what free speech means.
Well I'm sorry that you feel that way, but the fact is that every legal definition agrees with me. You're still arguing that YouTube can't deny them a platform & they are therefore owed a platform. Thanks for contacting for original Tweet.
-
-
You still haven’t answered this question. https://twitter.com/andrewdoyle_com/status/1236439826615934978?s=21 …https://twitter.com/andrewdoyle_com/status/1236439826615934978 …
-
I'll answer as soon as you acknowledge that you contradicted your original Tweet. You've been dodging this entire thread.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No, I don’t think they are owed a platform. I’m questioning the legality/morality of offering a service to the public and then discriminating against certain members of the public on the basis of race/sexuality/religion/political affiliation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.