Thats taking a life. Selfishly. Whether or not that process is painful is completely irrelevant. "Force them to suffer" Pretty sure they'd rather not be forced to DIE. Bottom line is no one should be making any decisions regarding an innocent being's life. We're not God.
-
-
Replying to @NkostaNostra_2 @DankProLifeMeme
If you gave a person the choice to: A. Before they even had consciousness, send them directly to ever lasting happiness or B. Suffer for 60 - 100 years & have less than a 1 in 33,000 chance of getting ever lasting happiness What do you think they would pick?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @NkostaNostra_2
This certainly seems to justify infanticide, which is weird
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But you're basing your entire moral framework on a Christian view of heaven and hell, but ignoring the Christian doctrine of morality and also the entire purpose of human existence. Our purpose here, on Christian theology, isn't to have a completely suffering free existence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The point of life on a Christian worldview is not to be free of suffering but to glorify God. That's why Jesus came to earth, and that's why this whole thing was started anyway. We aren't God's pets and our sole purpose isn't suffering avoidance
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DankProLifeMeme @NkostaNostra_2
Lol then what is your problem? You should be happy to say "Yes, we should continue to force people to suffer & be almost guaranteed to suffer for all eternity, because my god needs to be glorified." Why do you have a problem saying that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @NkostaNostra_2
Because I'm advocating against the killing of human beings. I don't believe it is our place to force people to suffer. What are you talking about?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wait... Unless you are suggesting that saying don't kill people is the same thing as forcing people to suffer. Are you saying that? Is that your view?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DankProLifeMeme @NkostaNostra_2
Rational Disconnect Retweeted Rational Disconnect
Yes, if someone is 100 cells they can't "suffer" if someone is in heaven they can't suffer. Any person that lives will suffer which is more suffering than ever lasting happiness lol Can you actually answer this question btw?https://twitter.com/rationaldis/status/1223000567448068096?s=21 …
Rational Disconnect added,
Rational Disconnect @RationalDisReplying to @NkostaNostra_2 @DankProLifeMemeIf you gave a person the choice to: A. Before they even had consciousness, send them directly to ever lasting happiness or B. Suffer for 60 - 100 years & have less than a 1 in 33,000 chance of getting ever lasting happiness What do you think they would pick?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @NkostaNostra_2
Again, you are attempting to critique the Christian worldview from the inside while not understanding it. Also the idea that saying "don't kill people" is equivalent to causing the unkilled people to suffer is such a hilarious disconnect that I'm surprised you believe it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, killing something that can't think or feel & guaranteeing them everlasting happiness is truly "suffering" WAY worse than having pain for 100 years with a 99% of being damned to every lasting suffering 
-
-
Replying to @RationalDis @NkostaNostra_2
Again, the Bible doesn't actually teach "everlasting suffering" but You already said you didn't care about that kind of thing
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.