Notice how often they focus on her being a kid and how it's unfair because criticizing a kid is bad optics. 1. They are criticizing her at the very moment. 2. If your disagreement was based on her arguments it wouldn't matter. Their line of attack is self-defeating.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's almost as if conservative pundits have cultivated a subculture where they and their followers confuse their visceral feelings of aesthetic displeasure with "argument"
-
Their feelings are the facts that disprove your feelings
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It really exposed that so many people on the right will destroy their own best interests in order to “own the libs”pic.twitter.com/0OJh5ffm3n
-
i don't want the kind of meat that person would grill
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Reactionaries do care about science but only if it's from the 18th century.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let's be real, they almost never use logic or science to argue their points. And they ignore any evidence that goes against it (for example, when it comes to gender and sex)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They have absolutely nothing of value to say.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lmao mark dice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The closest they get to an actual argument is WhAt AbOuT iNdIa AnD cHiNa because they can't figure out why the two nations that have a higher population than the USA might emit more than the USA.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.