No, the fundamental debate is over violating someone's bodily autonomy.
Even if a fetus is a person they can't be in a woman's body against her will.
Nice strawman tho 
Because the responsibility & options available to someone in both situations is drastically different. A court saying that you have to pay to keep me alive ≠ a court saying that I can hook my body to yours to keep me alive
-
-
How are those philosophically different? They both constitute a mandatory burden placed on you but you're just saying one is worse than the other because (????) This is my point - we draw these lines because we feel like they're correct.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.