Not sure I get your take? Sure, it being wildly reported as an accident doesn’t inherently mean it isn’t a coverup, but it certainly isn’t evidence that it is one. It seems irresponsible and illogical to treat both possibilities as equally worthy of consideration currently.
-
-
Replying to @PeanutButterGmr
I never used the term "cover up" and I wasn't suggesting one. It's clear they're worried about the backlash, (because many conflate Isis with Muslim migrants) so they are afraid to entertain the possibility. The fire was still burning and they acted as if they already KNEW.
3 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @ArmouredSkeptic @PeanutButterGmr
The knee-jerk reaction from the media to control the narrative before all the facts are even out is the telling part - their need to demonize people who can put 2 and 2 together on their own because they don't want to admit there is a problem.
20 replies 0 retweets 16 likes
Greg, you pushed a conspiracy theory & are still pushing misinformation about a “media narrative" that you think you uncovered. I guess responsible reporting is a "narrative" now You could at least Tweet out the facts, or would that hurt your narrative?https://www.newsweek.com/what-caused-notre-dame-fire-inquiry-calls-blaze-accident-rules-out-arson-1397598 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.