This is very dangerous revisionism. People like to pretend the Holocaust was purely the product of the Nazi regime, but it was built on centuries of antisemitism throughout Europe, including Poland. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/02/poland-holocaust-death-camps/552455/ …
-
-
-
Not even revisionism, the Nuremberg thesis after WW2 was it was started by Nazis but not by the German people. It was perpetuated by the cold-war establishment who wanted to rearm the West Germans to fight the Commies. It took until the 60s for that narrative to die by the way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m sure antman is missing something out, but it’s commonly agreed that ‘polish death camps’ is not acceptable. ‘Camps in occupied Poland’ or ‘Nazi camps’ is more accurate. Of course, Poland’s state censure of history is also unacceptable, but that’s something else entirely.
New conversation -
-
-
Even if what he was saying was correct limiting speech by law is not right
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give historical examples of „Poles role” in „the bloodiest chapter”, becayse I don’t really understand your accusations.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The camps were in Poland, but calling them "polish death camps" suggest they were controlled by the Poles, when they were not. I could see why a people badly abused by nazis wouldn't like language that helped to conflate the two, even if that's unintentional.
-
The purpose of the law doesn't seem to be holocaust denial. It just appears to be a group wanting to distance itself from crimes it didn't commit anyways, and that they were often times victims of. While there's an argument to be had about laws regulating speech being immoral.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
