Tim & I agree that YouTube has the right to censor anything they want to & I hope that we agree that they should do it to some extent i.e. terrorist recruitment, child porn, calls to kill or assault people etc. What we seem to disagree on is where exactly that line should be.
-
-
I would argue against what YouTube counts as being inappropriate & deserving of censorship, not that YouTube shouldn't censor some things I can say that I think a system should exist & still criticize it if I think it functions poorly or is being exploited & not contradict myself
Show this thread -
If Tim agrees that some things i.e. terrorist execution videos or calls to violence, should be censored, wouldn't he fall into the same supposed dilemma that he claims I am in if one of his videos is flagged? We would just disagree on where the line should be drawn.
Show this thread -
Finally, there is his argument "If the far right videos have more views wouldn't it make sense that the left mass flags them as well"
Show this thread -
I don't know of any Leftist groups that target & mass flag videos. As pointed out already, we know that these exist on the far right.
Show this thread -
I would argue that if propaganda videos are allowed by YouTube, but videos debunking them are not, then that is an example of the system not working or being applied unevenly, which Tim even agrees with at the end of his video. But that doesn't mean a system should exist at all.
Show this thread -
Okay, that was REALLY long, if you made it this far; thanks for reading all of that & please watch Tim's video. here is a posh puppy as a reward, you deserve it.pic.twitter.com/tpiPyzrGnU
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.