1. Yeah, & clearly we need to rethink it if we have 3 million people in the country who have been absorbed into job markets, but couldn't immigrant legally.
2. No, nationally they are neutral, & that's why I want to bring them under the tax system by giving them a path. 
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NinePath
1. Lol, of course, it will. How do you think that contradicts what I said? 2. [citation needed]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NinePath
LOL! What!? No, they drive down wages in the markets they are competing e.g. low skilled labor. Engineers aren't getting paid less becasue immagrants are picking fruit. Yup "Federation for American immigration reform" nice unbiased source boi
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NinePath
Lol, I'm not a socialist you moron, I'm making straight-up market-based arguments here.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RationalDis @NinePath
Yes, no one is saying that there is absolutely no downside, but only a very small number of natives are negative effected & we could correct for that by creating training programs to give them access to other careers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Lol, it's almost like we won't have to spend all of that money on illegal immigration if we give them a path to citizenship & we would actually go into the black because we would be taxing all of them 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.