Conversation

This is a somewhat reasonable heuristic in some situations. For instance, if someone gives you a really unreasonable argument for P this is evidence that their judgement of arguments isn’t very good, and so their best argument is more likely to be secretly bad.
2
40
Similarly, it is evidence that they are motivated to convince you even using faulty arguments, which is generally speaking a bad sign.
1
30
It has important implications. Sometimes people think β€œoh I will make 50 ok arguments for P instead of one really good one” but most folks are not very impressed by this, even though they should be.
2
31
Relatedly, if you try to turn a complicated thesis T into a social movement, the average reasonableness of an argument in favor of T will plummet, and so you may very quickly find that everyone perceives the anti-T-ers as being much more reasonable.
1
36
This will probably still be true even if the best pro-T arguments are very good, and especially true if the best pro-T arguments are subtle or hard to follow.
1
25
Yes, this is about ai risk. I don’t think this is a slam dunk argument against trying to make ai-risk-pilled-ness into a popular social movement, but it is a real cost, and nearly captures the shape of my real worries.
3
20
Show more replies

See what’s happening

Join Twitter to get the full story with all the live commentary.