@RapSheet but are they obligated to dispute it? Or can they if they wish?
-
-
-
@PFF_Steve@Cianaf The language is “may publicly disclose” -
@RapSheet Thanks Ian, does sounds a little suspect -
@PFF_Steve@RapSheet "Can discredit if they feel like it." Better than not being able to comment though. -
@WillBrinson@RapSheet call me cynical, but I think they just want us to believe Adderall is the only problem, and that rule helps -
@PFF_Steve@RapSheet That's a really interesting theory actually. -
@WillBrinson@PFF_Steve@RapSheet But if they wanted to pretend problems are minimal, why fight for HGH testing, or test at all? -
@JellyIntoAJam@WillBrinson@RapSheet because not testing for it looks even worse and HGH tests are extremely primitive at this point anyway
-
-
@RapSheet Are they required to dispute it? "can dispute" seems like an odd choice of words. -
@RapSheet You're assuming that because they can, then they will. That's not how logic works. What would they gain by calling him a liar? -
@RapSheet Because they can dispute does it mean they have to do so? -
@RapSheet Actually, a positive test would show amphetamine use, not specifically which amphetamine (such as Adderall). -
@RapSheet Doubt the NFL would dispute. A premier player taking Adderall is a better look for the NFL than the player using PEDs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.