Sadly not at all "unlikely" anymore.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Unlikely"
I guess this is the new "Unexpected."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just assume most of these are fake, at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want a fact-check on the statement that hate-crime hoaxes are uncommon.
-
Hard to know, since I can't find anybody that keeps track of the hoax numbers (which is why I put no faith in any assertion that it is higher or lower).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do they write these specifically so that "hoax" doesn't appear when retweeted?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Nathan Stang wasn’t a longtime member of St. David’s. He didn’t even believe in God." So an atheist pulls a hate hoax at 'his' church because he was 'stressed' by Trump's win? The article stretches tolerance to absurd lengths but, as is the WaPo's way, only in one direction.
-
I think once you accept it’s a WaPo story, it covers the proper ground. A gay, atheist, church going hoax creating activist divided a county, a country, and was enabled by a complicit media. Stang, as well as the 92 “news” agencies who pushed this story owe everyone an apology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My favorite hate crimes hoax categories: --The campus event staged by PC crowd to raise consciousness. --The graffiti with no witness that looks like a parody of a conservative. --The restaurant "no tip and nasty note" to minority or LGBT waiter/waitress. --Jussie Smollett.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.