Was brought to my attention that this comparison of 22 total stats from the ENTIRE season is being called "biased". But selecting one game and comparing a handful of stats instead is NOT biased apparently. Oh how the times have changed.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Good chart, seriously. Only question, why is TB12’s sacks green and DC4 isn’t? *Reality: If the Raiders win constantly, not a 3 game W streak followed by a 3 game L streak & back & forth but actually win 10-13 games a year for 2,3,4,5 years than every1 will be happy. Can they??
-
Because Tom is top-10 in fewest sacks, Derek isn’t.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Either way you paint it , Derek Carr Raider career will be ending soon. Whether this new year or next.
-
Bless your heart.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
How many turnovers in the end zone tho?pic.twitter.com/ZdJkqw7Ec5
Ovo je potencijalno osjetljiv multimedijski sadržaj. Saznajte više -
They both had 2 INT's in the redzone this season.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tom Brady is 42, Carr should technically be in his prime! This might be your worst argument yet
and Tom made the playoffs with a worst O-line and skill position players. And better stats -
And the best defense in the AFC. Lol lol
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Lol, show the stat that truly matters WINS, and did it with a way worse offensive team, give it up you continue to look bad as a Carr Stan
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.