Say what you will about the relative merits of the claims. This is a baller response.pic.twitter.com/DFk7rUU3co
-
Yes, this is not the play to make when you're holding a pair of twos... unless you think you can bluff it all the way to buying the pot.
Surely they’re hoping Smarmatic brings suit for discovery purposes?
-
-
There's a good chance that Smartmatic would be classed as a public figure and need to prove that 1) what Sydney said was false and 2) Sydney intentionally made false statements. More than likely, Smartmatic won't want to engage in discovery and even if they do they can't prove
-
the second prong of the test. Their only chance to win this case, would be to get it before a judge willing to class Smartmatic as a private entity, which is certainly possible given how the courts have been behaving.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And it won't.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Civil discovery is slightly less invasive than a high colonic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. It’s a lame game of chicken. Sidney knows they can’t afford to go to court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.