Bhaskar Sunkara — whoever that is — claims that “studying some military history” would reveal Churchill wasn’t decisive in victory. Funny, no ACTUAL historians have ever made that claim. But Mr Sunkara (more likely to be just a chip-on-shoulder foreign nationalist) does!https://twitter.com/sunraysunray/status/1301868987345702912 …
-
-
Replying to @RaheemKassam
Yes, I apologize, I didn’t realize that defending the British Empire’s worst leader was an important part of being of. being an American republican. Would you rather Churchill and Montgomery in overall command?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sunraysunray
I’m not an American, nor am I a Republican. But go off, clown.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RaheemKassam
And I am an American and a republican. Hence my lack of concern for a leader of the British Empire. I wish Churchill more actively fought fascism in the 1930s and was more competent in the Norwegian campaign, of course.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sunraysunray
You can wish whatever you like. Sir Winston gives zero fucks what you think and so will history.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RaheemKassam
Well said. Enjoy your life as the subject of a monarch in a failing state.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Your knowledge of the British constitution appears to be as solid as your knowledge of history. Subjecthood was replaced with citizenship almost a century ago. But comparing historical successes of nations, Britain’s monarchy-driven empire has far outlasted your republic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.