So tired of this weak argument that suggests if someone has been in combat, it means their political ideas are beyond critique.
The Founders didn't hide like this, nor did they pull their punches against political opponents who served.
@DavidAFrench is a fraudster.https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1280364360154730497 …
-
-
Replying to @RaheemKassam @DavidAFrench
Literally nobody has said this, and you know it. You're simply lying because you know your followers are all too happy to take the bait. What Tucker questioned was her _motives_. He claimed this war hero doesn't love her country--despite sacrificing all for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alltejuupptaget @DavidAFrench
You can quite easily BELIEVE you're loving your country and not be, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @alltejuupptaget @DavidAFrench
So in brief, we've found out that an anonybot account can't actually enter into discourse. Cool fail, bro.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RaheemKassam @DavidAFrench
Calling it "discourse" might be flattering yourself just a bit. 1) You lie by claiming French said political ideas were beyond critique 2) You change topic by switching to say that whether sacrificing all for one's country actually means loving it is decided by Tucker Carlsson
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
People like you REALLY know how to choose what hill to die on, don't you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You think I'm dying right now? Lmao. You need a shrink little man.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.