Raheem KassamVerified account

You realise models like this are usually just worst scenario guidance, right? It could be 84%, or 79%. But in a situation where little is known, models will exercise caution in order to preserve human life. Which is more than I can say for a lot of “conservatives”, lately.

Well no, that’s not how it works either. As we know more models are adjusted. Why would we NOT do that, lol? Also, we barely knew what the general impact of mitigation would be. Again, models had to assume the worst. Now we know the impact is far BETTER. Don’t be this guy.

"Don't be that guy" says the journalist who's still employed.

I work for a non profit that survives month to month on donations. Also, I’m more of a commentator. Thanks, bud.

Oh donations. So you're taking handouts while telling everyone who's been laid off to give it another month or so before they can pay for anything? Like it won't lead to and economic depression that kills more people than covid19? What a complete out of touch asshole you are.

Also, you look like a douche canoe in your scarfs.