The models took into account social distancing. They were wrong, that’s it. Honestly, I think they overestimated on purpose. Better to go high and be wrong then go low and be wrong.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @jasonjordan2814 @RaheemKassam
Yea I personally felt they Pushed a higher number to scare people into doing what they should do. I mean 2.5 million dead is very serious.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
And this should scare us all. The GOVT used fear to compel us into giving up our freedoms. We were not allowed to question the models or the modelers. Yet we accepted the economic destruction of millions of lives. The numbers never made sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
We have almost as many cases of corona. that we did in a year of the swine flu, the Number of dead is over the number of people that died at the hands of the h1n1. That's with close to what 2 months of cases.
4 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There’s always a lag in these numbers, hence the declines. Every year’s modelling does that until data input catches up. Don’t be fake news.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes it is a giant lag. I don’t need to look anything up because I already have seen this misinformation going around and I know how silly it is.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Your inability to interpret the numbers is, yes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.