the 500 SB lead and utg call into a pot of over 4K looks very weak so with me having the nut flush blocker I thought I could 1/2
-
-
Replying to @stephen_hancox1
rep the flush as only I could have the flush in that spot. I would have played the same way with a flush draw by checking (2/3*)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stephen_hancox1
agree you can only have the flush (or maybe AK). Interesting to know if +1 had Kc, and also what your 3bet range is pre there
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RagingAl_HS
I would have always bet AK on the turn. Utg had KQdd.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stephen_hancox1
also think that flop is a cool spot for KQ to lead. Gets so much value multiway there and protects vs fd
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RagingAl_HS
how quick did they call with the K. Wonder if F/FD was even a consideration/concern for them!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RagingAl_HS
he tanked for about 3mins. He said he thought I would bet flush draw on earlier street. Not sure I would though 4ways
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stephen_hancox1
I think we're neglecting one thing. It's all the SBs fault for flatting and starting these shenanigans!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RagingAl_HS
yea I know, and you know who the SB was?! Arnold!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stephen_hancox1
I just realised I said Arnold but meant Albert
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I thought that's what you meant. He probability had 72o...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.