Which Master’s Tour qualification method do you think is more difficult/impressive?
-
Each have their challenges. The marathon of ladder increases your sample size and allows the cream to rise to the top. This is somewhat true of tournaments as a player can optimise line ups and bam strats but it’s far more likely someone could highroll 1 tournament to qualify.
So Ladder probably just edges 5 top 8s for difficulty rating? Both require a very good understanding of strategies and meta over a longer and sustained period of time than a single tournament win.
-
-
I agree with all you said which just means we should have what we had in 2018, something between both :)
-
The old system was very good. I think 2018 they maybe took it a step too far with the sheer number of tour stops around the globe which ‘forced’ a number of players to become globetrotters for the year. Perhaps if there were 2 or 3 stops in each region per qualification period?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.