Speaking truth to power. “Based on the scientific evidence, he also doesn’t entertain an alternate theory—that someone found the coronavirus in the wild, brought it to a lab, and then it accidentally escaped.”https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/05/anthony-fauci-no-scientific-evidence-the-coronavirus-was-made-in-a-chinese-lab-cvd/ …
Having approved the awarding of NIH funding to Wuhan Institute of Virology--twice--Fauci has a massive conflict of interest on subject. Failure to disclose this conflict of interest represents journalistic malpractice.
-
-
Actually its normal for specialists to work with the NIH. The NIH gives grants to research institutions. Up until recently, the US had an expert working with virologists in china. This is all normal international research behavior and does not show any red flags.
-
The 2019 competitive renewal of the grant involved gain-of function-research requiring review under HHS Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) Framework. No P3CO review took place. Fauci's approval of grant without P3CO review is *major* red flag.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Richard, it really does complicate things doesn't it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In complete disclosure, the presence of a conflict interest does not mean he's wrong.
-
Absolutely. But failure to disclose is an ethical breach.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.