There is no "one-size fits all" test. What we need in hospitals is different than for surveillance. A 70% sensitive test done 2d in a row, gives 91% sensitivity by the second day. For public health, frequency and TAT are critical. @ADPaltiel @JAMA_current
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2768923 …https://twitter.com/roby_bhatt/status/1291325140744187905 …
-
-
If you have the time/inclination to reply further: Is there any preliminary data that supports (or points away from) conditional independence? Thanks either way for your efforts.
-
Anything that impedes the collection of a usable sample points TOWARD conditional independence.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
